Built by a physician with both defense and plaintiff workflows. Used by healthcare-defense firms representing OMS, dental, and allied surgical specialties across the country.
OMS defense is a specialty within a specialty. The plaintiff bar weaponizes the same predictable patterns case after case — lingual or inferior alveolar nerve injury after third-molar extraction, peri-implant nerve impingement, sedation events, post-extraction infection mismanagement. The MedLegal AI toolkit is built defense-aware from the ground up — reverse-mode deposition prep, Daubert challenge support against OMS plaintiff experts, CBCT imaging analysis, and defense-favorable causation framing across 2,000+ page records. Used on both sides on purpose.
Start free trial — no credit card → See pricingSwitch the AI examiner into defense-attorney mode. Build the hostile cross of the plaintiff and the plaintiff's treating dentist or OMS, pre-loaded with AAOMS + ADA standards used to attack the standard-of-care theory and the informed-consent record.
Generate Daubert vulnerability briefs against the plaintiff's OMS expert. Methodology gaps in nerve-injury causation, error-rate problems in retrospective imaging interpretation, peer-review thin spots, and rate-of-citation analysis against the AAOMS Parameters of Care.
Pre-op CBCT review with defense-favorable framing. Pre-existing anatomical variants surfaced (close proximity of inferior alveolar canal, lingual concavity geometry), alternative-cause timeline assembled, surgical-technique adherence mapped against the planned approach.
Rehearse your OMS client (or your defense expert) against the plaintiff's reptile playbook before they sit. Safety-rule traps on informed consent, community-danger frames on sedation, and the "would you agree that" cascade on known nerve-injury risks — prepared, not surprised.
Automated split of the chart into pre-incident anatomical findings (anomalous nerve-canal positioning, lingual concavity, prior periodontal disease) vs. claimed post-surgical changes. Imaging timeline, complaints timeline, and treatment timeline correlated to show what the chart actually supports — for damages mitigation arguments and apportionment defenses where multiple providers touched the case.
Annual plans available at 20% off. Volume / enterprise pricing for 20+ seats — [email protected].
No. The toolkit was built defense-aware. Reverse-mode deposition prep, Daubert support, reptile-defense drills, and defense-favorable causation framing are first-class workflows alongside the plaintiff-side modes.
Lingual + inferior alveolar nerve injury causation framing, CBCT imaging interpretation, implant placement vs. surgical-technique apportionment, anesthesia event chronology, informed-consent defense for known nerve-injury risks, scope-of-practice defense for sedation events.
Major healthcare-defense firms representing OMS, dental, chiropractic, and allied-health providers across the country.
Yes. The toolkit is workflow software, not a service provider — the same posture as Westlaw, Lexis, or Microsoft Word. No matter data leaves your firm; uploads are partitioned to your workspace and never used to train models or cross-pollinate workspaces.
Signed Business Associate Agreement available for all paid tiers. PHI handling on HIPAA-eligible infrastructure (AWS Bedrock, Polly, Transcribe Medical).
$19 pay-per-analysis · Pro $49/mo (1 seat) · Professional $249/mo (5 seats) · Firm $499/mo (20 seats). Free 14-day trial, no credit card.
14-day full-toolkit trial. Reverse-mode depo prep, Daubert support, 2,000-page record analysis, reptile-defense drill, CBCT analysis, and the full OMS specialty-pack library unlocked.
Start free trial → See pricing