Know how your witness testifies —
before opposing counsel does.
Send one deposition transcript. In 48 hours, retaining counsel receives a scored witness-performance readout — where the witness over-answers, adopts opposing counsel's framing, speculates, volunteers — with every finding quoted to page and line, and a coaching plan for each one. Built by a physician who has read tens of thousands of pages of testimony. Reviewed by a human before it reaches you. Then destroyed.
Testimony Audit
- Discipline Index scored on cross-examination answers only
- 13 failure-mode counts, each quoted to page:line
- Form-only coaching plan — how to answer, never what to say
- 48-hour delivery to retaining counsel
Deposition Week
- Each evening's rough transcript in, teardown by morning
- Your witnesses and theirs
- Received by 10pm → readout by 7am
- 3-day minimum, retainer up front
Watched Experts
- Performance file on the experts you face repeatedly
- Compounds with every transcript you add
- Private delivery to counsel — never published
How it works
Counsel countersigns our engagement letter. Two pages. It recites that the analysis is performed at counsel's direction in anticipation of litigation, and binds us to zero retention. We execute your protective order's vendor acknowledgment on request.
Send the transcript. Any format a court reporter produces. Our infrastructure already handles medical-legal records under BAAs.
48 hours later, counsel has the readout. Deterministic metrics — the same answer scored twice scores the same — human-reviewed before delivery, every flag pinned to the exact question and answer. Source and work product destroyed after delivery.
Why the paperwork matters as much as the analysis
In United States v. Heppner (S.D.N.Y. 2026), a federal court held that AI-assisted litigation materials prepared outside counsel's direction received no privilege and no work-product protection — while expressly leaving protected the work of tools operating as counsel's agent. Witnesses who "practice" with consumer chatbots are creating discoverable artifacts. Our engagement is structured the other way: retained by counsel, delivered to counsel, marked as work product, zero retention, no training on your data — and never provided to a testifying expert.
What it costs elsewhere
One hour of a named witness-preparation consultant runs $400–$1,500. A mock deposition session runs $1,800–$4,200. A human summary of the same transcript costs $300–$1,500 — and tells you what was said, not how your witness performed. The audit is priced below all of them because the analysis is engineered, not hourly; what you're paying for is the taxonomy, the pincites, and the coaching plan.
What this is not
Not legal advice, and not a substitute for counsel's own preparation. Metrics measure answer form in a specific transcript — never competence, honesty, or credibility. We coach how witnesses answer; we never touch what they should say. Testimony content is analyzed under counsel supervision; nothing is retained, resold, or used for training.