In February 2026 Supio added Tabular Analysis, Instant Ledger, and an Exhibit Builder. On April 16 they announced a one-click Westlaw Advantage integration. These are real upgrades and we treat them as real. Here's when Supio is the right call for your firm, and when MedLegal AI is.
We're not going to pretend these don't exist. Before you read the rest of this page, know what you're comparing against:
If your firm is evaluating both of us, that list is what you're getting from Supio. Now here's what you're getting from us.
| Dimension | Supio | MedLegal AI |
|---|---|---|
| Legal research integration | Westlaw Advantage native tie-in (Apr 16, 2026) | Not offered — keep your Westlaw seats |
| CRM auto-sync | MyCase, CasePeer, Litify, SmartAdvocate | Not yet — manual case setup |
| Trial exhibit builder | Automated Exhibit Builder (Feb 2026) | Export-to-PDF only |
| Firm-wide Knowledge Bases | Supio Knowledge Bases (Feb 2026) | Coming in Phase 4 (firm-scoped vector index) |
| PI / mass tort breadth | Full-lifecycle platform for PI + mass tort | Covered, but med-mal is the depth specialty |
| Dimension | Supio | MedLegal AI |
|---|---|---|
| Live deposition analysis | Not offered | Courtroom AI — real-time admission / evasion / foundation / chart-contradiction triggers during the depoAdd-on $99/$299 |
| Chart-vs-testimony cross-reference in real time | Not offered | Live contradiction surfacing with PDF-viewer pin |
| PubMed impeachment during depo | Not offered | Live NCBI lookup on any clinical claim the witness makes |
| Nursing-home chart-gaming detection | Generic flowsheet extraction (Tabular Analysis) | Braden Scale ↔ MDS Section G cross-check, F-Tag 686/689 flags, repositioning-note gap audits |
| Med-mal specialty prompt tuning | General-purpose case intelligence | 7 specialty prompts: ED misdiagnosis, birth injury, Rx error, surgical error, oncology missed-diagnosis, NH neglect, wrongful death |
| Pricing model | Per-user, quote-only; est. $150–$300/user/mo | Flat per-firm: $49 / $99 / $249 / $499 |
| 10-attorney firm annual cost | $18,000–$36,000+ per year (estimate) | $5,988/year at Practice tier |
| Trial / onboarding | Demo-gated sales cycle, quote-only | 3 free cases, no credit card, self-serve |
| Contract commitment | Annual, per third-party vendor reviews | Month-to-month, cancel any time |
If yes, Supio's Westlaw integration is a real benefit and worth weighing. If you're on Lexis, Casetext alone, or you don't do research-heavy appellate work, that integration is noise. For solo / small plaintiff firms where trial work dominates, the Westlaw tie-in rarely pays for itself.
Our thesis is that live deposition analysis is the single highest-leverage AI capability in plaintiff work — it's the moment the case is made or lost. If your firm does 5+ depositions per month and you want real-time impeachment support, chart-contradiction alerts, and an always-on element tracker, that's our core differentiator and Supio doesn't offer it. If you do occasional depos and spend most of your time on records review and demand drafting, Supio's Tabular Analysis and Exhibit Builder may be better-fit features.
Supio's ICP is PI and mass tort; their feature investments reflect that. We specialize in medical malpractice and the specific sub-genres where clinical-record interpretation wins or loses cases (ED misdiagnosis, missed PE/MI, birth injury HIE timing, nursing-home chart gaming). If your book is 80% med-mal, our specialty prompts catch things a generalist platform will miss. If your book is 80% auto/premises/slip-and-fall PI, Supio's focus probably wins.
Many firms run MedLegal AI alongside whatever practice-management and research stack they already pay for. Keep Westlaw for research. Keep MyCase / Filevine / CasePeer for case management. Add MedLegal AI for med-mal specialty analysis and live deposition support. That's how most of our 10+ attorney customers use us. It's how the stack is meant to work.
Start Free Trial (3 cases, no card) See the 6-minute demo
Yes. MedLegal AI Pro is $49/mo with no annual contract; Supio's entry tier is $349/mo on annual contract only ($4,188/yr commit). For a solo plaintiff attorney, MedLegal AI is roughly 7x cheaper at the entry tier. Supio's pricing makes sense at firms with 5+ attorneys handling primarily personal-injury volume; MedLegal AI is built for sub-5-attorney plaintiff med-mal firms.
No. Supio integrated Westlaw Advantage in April 2026 as a real differentiator for case-law research. MedLegal AI uses CourtListener (free, public-domain federal case law) plus PubMed for medical literature. For pure case-law citation depth, Supio + Westlaw wins. For medical-record analysis, depo prep, and Daubert challenges in med-mal cases, MedLegal AI's specialty tools win.
MedLegal AI for sub-5-attorney plaintiff med-mal firms: 22 specialty tools tuned for med-mal workflow (record review, Daubert, expert-witness research, demand letters, settlement evaluation), live Courtroom AI deposition transcription, and PubMed integration for medical literature. Supio for larger plaintiff firms doing high-volume personal-injury (auto, workers comp) where Tabular Analysis and Westlaw research are the key levers — Supio's PI-volume infrastructure handles 100+ cases per attorney better than MedLegal AI's solo-attorney-first design.
Most attorneys run them in parallel for 30 days, then drop Supio at renewal. MedLegal AI accepts uploads from Supio (PDF, DOCX, raw text); your case data isn't trapped in a proprietary format. The 14-day MedLegal AI free trial usually resolves the question — most plaintiff med-mal attorneys decide they don't need Supio's Tabular Analysis/Westlaw depth for med-mal-specific work.
No exact equivalents, but the Settlement Evaluation tool covers most of what Instant Ledger does (auto-pulling damages calculations from medical records into a settlement analysis). MedLegal AI doesn't have a direct Tabular Analysis competitor — for high-volume tabular case data, Supio is genuinely better. For plaintiff med-mal where each case is bespoke, Tabular Analysis matters less than per-case depth.