What's the integration story between Spellbook and MedLegal AI?

There's no formal integration. The natural workflow is: a plaintiff firm with both subscriptions uses Spellbook for the engagement-letter and fee-agreement drafting at intake, then transitions the case to MedLegal AI for the litigation prep (chronology, demand letter, expert match, deposition prep). They sit at different stages of the case lifecycle, not in competition.

How do the prices compare?

Spellbook starts at $99/mo per seat for the Lite tier (with usage caps); pro tiers go up to $350/mo. MedLegal AI starts at $49/mo for individual access to all 23 tools, $249/mo for the Pro tier with higher analysis limits, $499/mo for the Firm tier with 3 user seats. Combined stack for a 1-attorney firm runs roughly $148-$849/mo depending on tier choices — typically a small fraction of one settled med-mal case.

Honest comparison · 2026

MedLegal AI vs Spellbook: they don't compete — use both.

Most legal-AI comparison pages exist to argue Vendor A is better than Vendor B. This isn't one of those. Spellbook is built for transactional contract drafting. MedLegal AI is built for plaintiff medical-malpractice litigation. The 15-second answer to "do I need both?" is yes, if your firm does both. Here's the longer version.

The TL;DR table: if your active matters are contracts, use Spellbook. If they're litigation, especially med-mal litigation, use MedLegal AI. Plaintiff firms with a transactional client-services arm typically run both. Combined monthly cost is a fraction of one settled mid-tier case.

Where each tool actually lives in the case lifecycle

Stage	Spellbook	MedLegal AI
Engagement letter / fee agreement drafting	✓ Spellbook	—
Master services agreements / NDAs	✓ Spellbook	—
Contract redlining / clause negotiation	✓ Spellbook	—
Plaintiff intake screening (med-mal)	—	✓ MedLegal AI
Medical chronology / records analysis	—	✓ MedLegal AI
Standard-of-care analysis tied to PubMed	—	✓ MedLegal AI
Demand letter generation	—	✓ MedLegal AI
Daubert vulnerability workups	—	✓ MedLegal AI
Expert witness research / vetting	—	✓ MedLegal AI
Deposition prep + cross-exam question banks	—	✓ MedLegal AI
Live deposition transcription + PubMed lookup	—	✓ MedLegal AI
Settlement evaluation against jurisdictional verdicts	—	✓ MedLegal AI

What Spellbook is genuinely good at

If you draft contracts as part of your practice, Spellbook is the strongest in-Word AI assistant available in 2026. Specifically:

In-Word integration. Spellbook lives inside Microsoft Word as a sidebar. It learns from your firm's prior contracts and suggests clause language in your house style. No copy-paste workflow.
Clause benchmarking. Identifies clauses that deviate from market norms — useful for both protecting your client during negotiation and flagging unfair terms in opposing party drafts.
Risk scoring. Each contract gets a heat-mapped risk overlay so you know which clauses warrant the most attention.

What Spellbook does NOT do: anything related to litigation prep, evidence analysis, medical records, expert witnesses, or court filings. It's deliberately scoped to transactional work.

What MedLegal AI is genuinely good at

MedLegal AI is purpose-built for plaintiff medical-malpractice litigation. The 23 tools cover the full case lifecycle from intake through trial:

Case Analysis. Upload chart records, get a strength score, payout range, recommended experts, and a draft motion in 90 seconds.
Live deposition transcription with real-time PubMed lookups during cross-examination. Read about this workflow. To our knowledge, no other legal-AI vendor (including Filevine Depo CoPilot) ships live PubMed retrieval.
Daubert workups tied to PubMed citations + expert prior-testimony pattern analysis.
PACER NoS=362 verdict comparables for settlement evaluation.
Citation verification by default. Every legal citation is verified live against CourtListener; every medical claim comes from a PubMed query that actually ran. Hallucination-resistant by architecture.

What MedLegal AI does NOT do: contracts, MSAs, NDAs, transactional redlining, anything outside the litigation context.

The "do I need both?" decision tree

If your firm is

100% plaintiff litigation, no transactional work: MedLegal AI alone. You don't need Spellbook because you're not drafting third-party contracts.

If your firm is

100% transactional, no litigation: Spellbook alone (or a Spellbook competitor). MedLegal AI's tools won't translate to your work.

If your firm is

Mixed plaintiff litigation + transactional: Use both. Spellbook for the front-of-engagement contract work; MedLegal AI for the case lifecycle. Combined cost for a solo: $148/mo (Spellbook Lite + MedLegal Individual). Combined cost for a small firm: $599-$849/mo (Spellbook Pro + MedLegal Firm).

If your firm is

Pure med-mal plaintiff (your engagement letter doesn't change much case-to-case): A free Word template + MedLegal AI is enough. Spellbook's value compounds when you're drafting many different clause types per week; if you're using the same retainer template each intake, Spellbook is overpaying.

Honest cost stack

Stack	Monthly cost	Best fit
MedLegal AI Individual	$49/mo	Solo plaintiff med-mal
MedLegal AI Pro	$249/mo	1-3 attorney med-mal firm
MedLegal AI Firm	$499/mo	3-5 attorney med-mal firm
Spellbook Lite	$99/mo	Light contract review
Spellbook Pro	$350/mo	Heavy contract drafting
Combined Solo (MLA Indiv + Spellbook Lite)	$148/mo	Solo with mixed practice
Combined Firm (MLA Firm + Spellbook Pro)	$849/mo	3-5 attorney mixed practice

For perspective: a single mid-tier med-mal settlement (~$500K) generates a ~$166K contingency fee. The $849/mo combined stack is roughly 0.6% of that fee — for a tool stack that compresses each case's prep time by an estimated 8-12 hours.

FAQ

Do MedLegal AI and Spellbook compete?

No. Spellbook is built for transactional law — contract drafting, redlining, MSAs, NDAs. MedLegal AI is built for plaintiff medical-malpractice litigation — case analysis, depositions, demand letters, Daubert workups. Essentially zero feature overlap.

Can I use MedLegal AI for contract drafting?

No, and we recommend against it. MedLegal AI's outputs are tuned for litigation context — clinical timelines, deviation-from-standard-of-care analysis, Daubert vulnerability flagging. None of that translates to contract review.

Why did you build a comparison page if you don't compete?

Because plaintiff attorneys evaluating legal-AI in 2026 see Spellbook in every Google search result and reasonably ask "do I need both?" We'd rather you understand what each tool does than guess at half-overlap. Anti-pattern: vendors who imply they replace tools they don't actually replace.

Try MedLegal AI free for 14 days.

All 23 tools. No credit card. No sales call. Built specifically for plaintiff med-mal — Daubert workups, live deposition transcription with PubMed, expert vetter, demand letter, chronology, the works.

Start free trial → Or get a free case score →

More comparisons: vs CoCounsel · vs EvenUp · vs Supio · vs Filevine · vs Eve Legal · all comparisons