OMFSNerve injuryPlaintiff-side

Built for IAN + sedation + MRONJ cases.
AI deposition trainer with AAOMS Parameters depth.

OMFS medmal cases concentrate around IAN/lingual nerve injury from 3rd molar extractions, office sedation deaths, BRONJ/MRONJ from extraction in bisphosphonate patients, and dental implant nerve injuries. AAOMS Parameters of Care + Position Papers define the floors.

Try the 2-min OMFS demo → All specialties
6
OMFS failure modes
3
cited guidelines
1
signature impeachment trap

Why a omfs-specific trainer matters

OMFS cases turn on documented pre-op CBCT for at-risk extractions, specific named-nerve consent (not boilerplate), capnography during office sedation, and MRONJ risk discussion in bisphosphonate patients.

The 6 failure modes

Sev 10

Office sedation death

Patient died during in-office GA / deep sedation; capnography absent, ACLS-trained personnel not present.

"I administered the anesthesia myself and was monitoring."
Sev 9

IAN injury — high-risk extraction

Lower 3rd molar near IAN; no pre-op CBCT or specific consent; permanent paresthesia.

"I don't go through every nerve specifically."
Sev 9

Lingual nerve injury

Lingual nerve injury from lingual retraction; permanent taste/sensation loss.

"I used lingual retraction — that's how I was trained."
Sev 9

BRONJ/MRONJ — extraction in bisphosphonate patient

IV-bisphosphonate / denosumab patient extracted without risk discussion or alternative consideration.

"She mentioned Prolia but the tooth had to come out."
Sev 9

Mandibular fracture — extraction

Mandibular fracture during lower 3rd molar; not recognized intraop.

"I heard a crack but I didn't think it was a fracture."
Sev 9

Dental implant — nerve injury

Implant near IAN/mental nerve without CBCT + safety margin.

"I planned with the standard PA radiograph."

The signature impeachment trap

"I always discuss risks generally" vs documented specific consent

For nerve-injury cases: lock the witness into "I always discuss risks generally," then juxtapose against the AAOMS standard requiring documented specific consent enumerating nerve-injury risks by name.

"You discuss risks generally?" → "Yes."
"AAOMS Parameters of Care require documented specific consent enumerating IAN, lingual, and mental nerve injury for at-risk extractions?" → "Yes."
"Your consent form for this patient does not specifically name the IAN."

Why this lands: witness has framed boilerplate consent as a substitute for specific named-nerve discussion.

The 3 cited guidelines

AAOMS Parameters of Care for 3rd Molar SurgeryIAN/lingual nerve risk assessment + consent standards
AAOMS Position Paper on MRONJRisk stratification + extraction-vs-alternatives in bisphosphonate patients
AAOMS Office Anesthesia StandardsCapnography + emergency drugs + ACLS personnel

FAQ

Why does OMFS need its own deposition trainer?

OMFS cases turn on documented pre-op CBCT, specific named-nerve consent, capnography in sedation, and MRONJ discussion. AAOMS Parameters of Care are real published floors.

What guidelines does the AI cite?

AAOMS Parameters of Care for 3rd Molar Surgery, AAOMS Position Paper on MRONJ, AAOMS Office Anesthesia Standards.

Does it work for defense expert prep?

Yes. Expert-prep mode against your defense OMFS.

Pricing?

Bundled in MedLegal AI Pro ($49/mo), Professional ($249/mo), or Firm ($499/mo).

Start with the 2-minute omfs demo

No signup, no mic. Cross-exam transfers to OMFS — lock witness into AAOMS Parameters of Care.

Run the 2-min demo → Start free 14-day trial

Deposing an oral & maxillofacial surgery expert on the other side? See questions to ask an oral & maxillofacial surgery expert witness at deposition.