Supio raised $60M and is excellent at PI-volume work — high-throughput case intake, mass demand-letter generation, record-request administration. For complex plaintiff medical-malpractice cases where the workflow IS the case complexity (Daubert challenges, multi-expert teardowns, 5,000-page Bates record review), specialty alternatives often fit better. Honest comparison of 5 alternatives — pricing, feature parity, and which wins for plaintiff bar specifically.
This page is not a Supio takedown. We tell every customer who asks: if you run 50+ PI cases concurrently and your bottleneck is intake automation + bulk demand letters, Supio is probably the right tool. We hear that from plaintiff PI firms regularly.
What we hear from plaintiff med-mal firms: Supio's record-review feature is OK for routine PI claims (slip-and-fall, MVA), but on a complex obstetric birth-injury case with a 5,000-page Bates record, the volume tools don't surface the missed Category-III tracing on hour 31. They surface "documents about the patient" — which is necessary, not sufficient. Same pattern with Daubert: Supio summarizes case research; it doesn't pull the defense expert's last 10 federal reports and find methodology drift.
Different jobs. Different tools. This page is for plaintiff med-mal attorneys deciding which job they're solving for.
| Tool | Starting price | Free trial | Best for | Plaintiff med-mal fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MedLegal AI | $49/mo | 14-day free + pay-per-analysis $19 | Plaintiff med-mal, birth injury, complex PI | ★ Highest — 22 specialty tools |
| Supio | ~$500-$1,500/seat/mo | Demo only | High-volume PI (50+ active cases) | Medium — broad PI tooling, not med-mal-specific |
| EvenUp | $99-$299/letter | Free first letter | Demand-letter generation only | Narrow — letters only, no chronology / Daubert / depo |
| Filevine AI | ~$200/seat/mo (bundled) | Demo only | PI/med-mal firms already on Filevine CMS | Medium — strong if you already use Filevine |
| CoCounsel | $225/mo | Demo only | BigLaw + general practice | Medium — broad, general-purpose |
| Eve Legal | $89/mo | 14-day | Solo / small-firm general practice | Low — not med-mal-tuned |
MedLegal AI is the tool we wished Supio was when we ran our first med-mal case workups. 22 specialty tools across 7 plaintiff practice areas (medical malpractice, PI, nursing home, wrongful death, birth injury, product liability, workers' comp), each tuned for the specific workflow that vertical actually uses.
Supio's strengths are real. Their April 2026 Series B raised $60M, validating the high-volume PI thesis. They integrated with Westlaw Advantage, added Tabular Analysis (their structured-data extraction tool) in Feb 2026, and shipped Exhibit Builder for trial prep. For PI firms running 50+ active cases concurrently, Supio's intake automation alone often saves 1-2 paralegal-equivalents.
The trade-off: Supio's pricing scales with seats and case volume. Solo to 10-attorney med-mal firms typically pay more for tooling they don't fully use (intake automation when you intake 5 cases/quarter is overkill).
EvenUp focuses narrowly on AI-generated demand letters for PI claims. Per-letter pricing ($99-$299) makes it useful as an add-on to whatever case-management you already use. Doesn't do chronology, Daubert, depo prep, or expert research. Strictly demand letters.
For plaintiff med-mal firms, EvenUp is a complement, not a replacement. Use it for the routine demand-letter step; pair with MedLegal AI for the case-build phase.
Filevine has been the default plaintiff CMS for years (Litify is the BigLaw competitor). Their AI features bundle into the existing Filevine seat at ~$200/mo total. If you're already on Filevine, the AI add-on is the easiest path — no new vendor to onboard.
The trade-off: Filevine AI is a horizontal AI layer on top of a CMS. It does many things passably; doesn't have specialty depth on Daubert, birth-injury record review, or live deposition. Good for routine work; not the right tool for complex med-mal trial prep.
CoCounsel (Thomson Reuters' legal AI) is what Casetext became after the 2023 acquisition. $225/mo entry tier, requires Westlaw bundle. Strong general-purpose AI legal research with broad practice-area coverage. For plaintiff med-mal specifically, the same critique as Supio applies: broad, general, not tuned for the complexity that defines med-mal cases.
If you're already a Westlaw subscriber, CoCounsel is the natural upgrade. If you're not, the bundle pricing is hard to justify on plaintiff economics.
Eve Legal launched as a deliberate response to the Casetext shutdown. $89/mo solo, decent AI legal research and document review, practice-area-agnostic. Good for general practice; not med-mal-tuned.
| Your situation | Pick |
|---|---|
| Solo plaintiff med-mal, <10 cases/yr | MedLegal AI Pro ($49/mo) or pay-per-analysis ($19/run) |
| 2-10 attorney plaintiff med-mal firm | MedLegal AI Professional ($249/mo, 5 seats) or Firm ($499/mo, 20 seats) |
| 10-50 attorney mixed PI + med-mal firm | Both: Supio for PI intake/volume, MedLegal AI for med-mal complexity |
| 50+ attorney high-volume PI firm (>50% PI auto) | Supio is the right call. We're not pretending we beat them at scale. |
| Already on Filevine CMS | Filevine AI add-on for routine work + MedLegal AI for med-mal-specific |
| Already on Westlaw + need broad legal research | CoCounsel + MedLegal AI Pro |
Supio is an AI platform for personal-injury attorneys focused on case intake, demand-letter generation, and medical-record analysis at high volume. It raised $60M (April 2026) and integrated with Westlaw Advantage. Strongest for firms running 50+ active PI cases at any time. Not specifically tuned for medical-malpractice complexity (Daubert, expert witness research, deposition prep).
Yes. Supio's published pricing starts around $500-$1,500 per user per month with annual contracts. MedLegal AI Pro is $49/mo with month-to-month; Professional is $249/mo for 5 seats; Firm is $499/mo for 20 seats — all 23 specialty tools included. EvenUp focuses on demand letters at $99-$299/letter. Filevine AI bundles into a $200+/mo case-management seat.
For a 1-10 attorney plaintiff med-mal firm, yes. MedLegal AI's 23 tools include Daubert teardown, expert witness research, live deposition analysis, demand-letter generation, settlement evaluator, and depo prep — all tuned to plaintiff-side workflows. Supio is broader (PI volume + intake automation), but if your practice is complex med-mal cases (birth injury, surgical-error, hospital negligence) rather than auto-PI volume, MedLegal AI's specialty depth wins.
Yes — and several customers do. Supio handles intake automation + early-stage record requests at scale; MedLegal AI handles complex case workup once a case is in active litigation. For PI-heavy practices that occasionally take med-mal, this split works well. Combined cost: ~$400/mo (Supio entry tier + MedLegal AI Pro).
April 2026 Series B. The thesis: PI is a $40B/yr legal vertical and AI can compress the highest-cost line items (intake, record-request administration, demand-letter drafting). Supio's metric: customers report 30-50% time saved on those administrative tasks. The funding round signals strong product-market fit for high-volume PI firms but doesn't change the comparison for plaintiff med-mal firms whose case volume is lower but per-case complexity is higher.
14-day full-access trial. All 23 tools. HIPAA + BAA. No credit card to start. Cancel anytime. If you're a plaintiff med-mal attorney unsure whether Supio fits — try the specialty tool first. We'll tell you honestly if it doesn't.
Start free trial →
Last updated May 5, 2026. Pricing reflects publicly-listed pricing on each vendor's website at time of writing. Supio's pricing is not publicly disclosed; figures quoted are typical entry-tier ranges from market intelligence as of May 2026. Confirm current pricing directly with each vendor.
Related: vs Supio (post-Westlaw 2026 detail) · vs Casetext (shut down) · vs EvenUp · vs CoCounsel