Medical Malpractice Wrongful Death Settlement Ranges (2026)
A wrongful-death case is the one category where the injury does not set the value — the statute does. Who may recover, what they may recover for, whether the decedent's own pain and suffering survives as a separate claim, and whether a separate cap applies are all fixed by state law, and two identical deaths can be worth very different amounts across a state line. The decedent's age, earnings, and dependents then fill in the economic side.
Wrongful-death claims arise from every specialty, so the table below shows the model's all-specialty band for each state as the directional anchor, followed by the statutory and factual drivers that decide where a death case sits — and, further down, every state whose verified 2026 cap summary specifically addresses wrongful death.
How these numbers were produced — read this first
The figures on this page are estimated ranges from MedLegal AI's case-comparables model — the same model our Case Analysis tool uses to frame settlement discussions. They are not averages or statistics pulled from a verdict-reporter database, no specific verdict or settlement is cited, and no number here is "the average settlement" for any case type.
Treat them as directional planning estimates only. Actual outcomes vary widely with the specific facts, the severity and permanence of injury, the venue and jury pool, applicable damages caps, insurance limits, and the quality of counsel and experts on both sides. Many meritorious cases resolve below these ranges; catastrophic-injury cases can resolve far above them. Always verify case value with a licensed attorney in the relevant state.
Wrongful Death — national spread of the model's ranges
$80K (lowest state low) → $535K–$775K (typical state's central estimate) → $15M (highest state high)
All-specialty band across 51 jurisdictions. Where a specific case sits inside — or beyond — its state's range is decided by the drivers below.
What moves a medical malpractice wrongful death case up or down the range
- Who survived the decedent — Dependent minor children and a surviving spouse carry the largest economic-support and companionship claims; the death of an adult with no dependents is a smaller statutory claim in most states.
- The decedent's age and earnings — Lost future support is computed from earnings, work-life expectancy, and personal-consumption offsets; a young high earner and a retiree produce very different numbers from the same negligence.
- Survival claim — Whether the state recognizes a survival action and allows conscious pain and suffering, and how long the decedent survived the negligent act with awareness.
- Non-economic recovery rule — Whether survivors may recover for grief and loss of companionship, or are limited to pecuniary loss.
- Wrongful-death cap — Whether the state caps wrongful-death damages separately, caps total damages, or has no cap at all — the single largest structural driver in these cases.
The medicine the case turns on
Wrongful death is a statutory claim, not a common-law one. In most states it is brought by a personal representative for the benefit of a defined class of survivors — typically the spouse, children, and sometimes parents or dependents — and it compensates those survivors for their losses: the decedent's lost financial support and services and, depending on the state, the loss of companionship, guidance, and consortium. A separate survival action, where the state recognizes one, belongs to the estate and recovers the decedent's own damages between injury and death — medical expenses, and in many states conscious pain and suffering.
The states differ sharply on non-economic recovery. Some allow survivors to recover for grief and loss of companionship; others have historically limited wrongful-death recovery to pecuniary loss, which makes the death of a child, a retiree, or a non-earning spouse a small case regardless of the negligence. Several states also cap wrongful-death or total damages separately from the general non-economic cap — see the verified summaries below.
Severity tiers — where the case sits in the state range
| Injury profile | Where the model's range applies |
|---|---|
| Elderly decedent, no dependents, short survival, pecuniary-loss state | Bottom of the band or below. |
| Working-age decedent with a spouse, or a child in a state allowing companionship damages | Middle to top of the band. |
| Young high earner with dependent children, prolonged conscious suffering, no-cap state | Top of the band and above. |
Tiers describe where a case profile typically sits within the model's range for its state; they are not separate dollar estimates.
Value the actual case — not the injury category
Enter the injury, liability, and venue facts and get a defensible settlement range you can put in front of a client or an adjuster, then build the case plan around it.
Settlement Valuation Calculator → Build a Case PlanWrongful Death — estimated ranges by state
The model has no medical malpractice wrongful death-specific specialty. Each row is the state's all-specialty band: the lowest of the six specialty lows, the median of the six specialty medians, and the highest of the six specialty highs. It is a directional anchor for the state's general malpractice climate, not a medical malpractice wrongful death statistic — see the methodology note above.
| State | Low (est.) | Median (est.) | High (est.) | State guide |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | $100K | $525K | $3M | guide |
| Alaska | $150K | $675K | $4M | guide |
| Arizona | $150K | $675K | $3.5M | guide |
| Arkansas | $80K | $425K | $2.8M | guide |
| California | $80K | $250K | $500K | guide |
| Colorado | $150K | $675K | $3.5M | guide |
| Connecticut | $200K | $875K | $6M | guide |
| Delaware | $200K | $775K | $4.5M | guide |
| District of Columbia | $200K | $1.1M | $8M | guide |
| Florida | $200K | $800K | $6M | guide |
| Georgia | $150K | $675K | $4M | guide |
| Hawaii | $150K | $675K | $4M | guide |
| Idaho | $100K | $500K | $3M | guide |
| Illinois | $200K | $1M | $8M | guide |
| Indiana | $100K | $500K | $1.3M | guide |
| Iowa | $150K | $625K | $4M | guide |
| Kansas | $100K | $525K | $3.2M | guide |
| Kentucky | $150K | $625K | $4M | guide |
| Louisiana | $150K | $625K | $3.5M | guide |
| Maine | $150K | $675K | $4M | guide |
| Maryland | $200K | $875K | $6M | guide |
| Massachusetts | $200K | $925K | $6.5M | guide |
| Michigan | $150K | $675K | $4.5M | guide |
| Minnesota | $180K | $775K | $5M | guide |
| Mississippi | $80K | $410K | $2.5M | guide |
| Missouri | $150K | $675K | $4M | guide |
| Montana | $120K | $535K | $3.5M | guide |
| Nebraska | $120K | $535K | $3.5M | guide |
| Nevada | $150K | $675K | $4M | guide |
| New Hampshire | $150K | $675K | $4M | guide |
| New Jersey | $150K | $825K | $6M | guide |
| New Mexico | $150K | $625K | $4M | guide |
| New York | $300K | $1.8M | $15M | guide |
| North Carolina | $150K | $675K | $4M | guide |
| North Dakota | $100K | $490K | $3.2M | guide |
| Ohio | $150K | $675K | $4M | guide |
| Oklahoma | $120K | $535K | $3.5M | guide |
| Oregon | $180K | $775K | $5M | guide |
| Pennsylvania | $200K | $1.1M | $8M | guide |
| Rhode Island | $180K | $775K | $5M | guide |
| South Carolina | $150K | $635K | $3.8M | guide |
| South Dakota | $100K | $490K | $3.2M | guide |
| Tennessee | $150K | $635K | $3.8M | guide |
| Texas | $150K | $635K | $3.5M | guide |
| Utah | $120K | $535K | $3.5M | guide |
| Vermont | $150K | $675K | $4M | guide |
| Virginia | $150K | $675K | $4.5M | guide |
| Washington | $200K | $825K | $5.5M | guide |
| West Virginia | $120K | $535K | $3.5M | guide |
| Wisconsin | $150K | $675K | $4M | guide |
| Wyoming | $100K | $490K | $3.2M | guide |
How your state's damages cap changes this
Wrongful death is where cap structure matters most. Some states cap wrongful-death damages at a different level than injury damages, some cap total damages, and some have no cap. The verified 2026 summaries that specifically address wrongful death are listed below; every other state's summary is one click away in the table above.
Three illustrative states — a low fixed non-economic cap, an indexed cap schedule, and no cap — from the verified 2026 cap file used across this site. Every other state's summary is linked from the table above.
Texas
Texas caps noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases at $250,000 against all physicians and non-institutional providers combined, plus up to $250,000 per healthcare institution (maximum two institutions), for a maximum of $750,000; these figures are not inflation-adjusted. A separate cap limits TOTAL damages in wrongful death and survival cases to $500,000 in 1977 dollars indexed to inflation — roughly $2.65 million as of mid-2026.
Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §§74.301, 74.303
California
California caps noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases under MICRA as modernized by AB 35: for cases resolved in 2026 the cap is $470,000 in injury cases and $650,000 in wrongful death cases. The caps rise $40,000 and $50,000 per year respectively until reaching $750,000 (injury) and $1,000,000 (wrongful death), then grow 2% annually.
Cal. Civ. Code §3333.2, as amended by AB 35 (2022)
New York
New York has no cap of any kind on medical malpractice damages — noneconomic, economic, or punitive. Juries may award full compensation for pain and suffering without statutory limitation.
No cap statute exists; caps appear only as unenacted legislative proposals
Other states whose verified 2026 cap summary specifically addresses wrongful death
Alaska
Alaska caps noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases at $250,000, rising to $400,000 when the case involves wrongful death or a severe permanent physical impairment that is more than 70 percent disabling. The cap applies per single injury regardless of the number of providers or claims.
Alaska Stat. §09.55.549(d)-(e)
Colorado
Colorado caps noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases; under 2024's HB24-1472 the cap is $530,000 for malpractice occurring on or after January 1, 2026, climbing in annual steps to $875,000 by 2029. A separate medical malpractice wrongful death noneconomic cap of $810,000 applies to acts in 2026, rising to $1,575,000 by 2029.
C.R.S. §13-64-302 and §13-21-203(1)(b), as amended by HB24-1472 (2024)
Florida
Florida no longer enforces caps on noneconomic damages in medical malpractice lawsuits. The Florida Supreme Court struck down the statutory caps as unconstitutional — for wrongful death in 2014 and for personal injury in 2017 — so although the cap language remains on the books, it is unenforceable.
Estate of McCall v. United States, 134 So. 3d 894 (Fla. 2014); North Broward Hosp. Dist. v. Kalitan, 219 So. 3d 49 (Fla. 2017), invalidating Fla. Stat. §766.118
Kansas
Kansas no longer caps noneconomic damages in medical malpractice injury cases: the Kansas Supreme Court struck down the statutory cap as violating the jury-trial right in 2019, overruling its earlier decision that had upheld the cap in malpractice cases. A separate $250,000 noneconomic cap still applies in wrongful death actions.
Hilburn v. Enerpipe Ltd., 309 Kan. 1127 (2019), invalidating K.S.A. 60-19a02; K.S.A. 60-1903 (wrongful death cap survives)
Maryland
Maryland caps noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases at $920,000 for causes of action arising in 2026, a figure that rises $15,000 each January 1. In wrongful death cases with two or more claimants, the aggregate cap is 125% of that amount — $1,150,000 for 2026.
Md. Cts. & Jud. Proc. §3-2A-09
Missouri
Missouri caps noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases, with the caps rising 1.7% each year: for 2026 the cap is $481,493 for most injuries and $842,614 for catastrophic injuries and wrongful death. Economic damages are not capped.
RSMo §538.210 (2015 re-enactment, SB 239); 2026 figures per Mo. Dep't of Commerce & Insurance cap table
Oklahoma
Oklahoma has no cap on noneconomic damages in medical malpractice injury cases: the Oklahoma Supreme Court struck down the $350,000 statutory cap as an unconstitutional special law in 2019, and the legislature has not enacted a replacement. Wrongful death recoveries cannot be capped at all under the Oklahoma Constitution.
Beason v. I.E. Miller Servs., Inc., 2019 OK 28, striking 23 O.S. §61.2; Okla. Const. art. 23, §7
Oregon
Oregon has no enforceable cap on noneconomic damages for medical malpractice claims brought by living plaintiffs — the Oregon Supreme Court held the $500,000 statutory cap unconstitutional for personal injury cases in 2020. The $500,000 cap still applies to wrongful death claims, where courts have upheld it.
ORS 31.710; Busch v. McInnis Waste Sys., Inc., 366 Or. 628 (2020)
Tennessee
Tennessee caps noneconomic damages in healthcare liability actions at $750,000 per injured plaintiff, rising to $1,000,000 for catastrophic injuries such as paraplegia, quadriplegia, amputation, severe burns, or the wrongful death of a parent leaving minor children. The Tennessee Supreme Court upheld the cap in 2020 and it remains in effect.
T.C.A. §29-39-102; McClay v. Airport Mgmt. Servs., 596 S.W.3d 686 (Tenn. 2020)
Utah
Utah caps noneconomic damages in medical malpractice injury cases at $450,000 for causes of action arising after May 15, 2010. The Utah Supreme Court held the cap unconstitutional as applied to wrongful death cases, so families in malpractice death cases can recover uncapped noneconomic damages while the cap still applies to non-fatal injury cases.
Utah Code §78B-3-410; Smith v. United States, 2015 UT 68
West Virginia
West Virginia caps noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases at a base of $250,000 per occurrence, or $500,000 for catastrophic cases (wrongful death, permanent serious disfigurement or loss of limb or organ system, or injuries permanently preventing independent self-care). Both figures adjust annually for inflation but cannot exceed 150% of the base, so the operative 2026 ceilings are $375,000 and $750,000.
W. Va. Code §55-7B-8; upheld in MacDonald v. City Hospital, 227 W. Va. 707 (2011)
West Virginia settlement ranges · West Virginia malpractice guide
Cap rules change and are frequently litigated — verify the current statute before relying on any summary here.
Liability guides for medical malpractice wrongful death cases
- Wrongful death medical malpractice — the framework
- Wrongful death damages by state
- Failure-to-diagnose malpractice
- Delayed sepsis diagnosis malpractice
Frequently asked questions
What is the estimated settlement range for a medical malpractice wrongful death case?
Across the 51 jurisdictions in MedLegal AI's case-comparables model, the all-specialty band runs from a low of $80K in the most conservative state to a high of $15M in the most plaintiff-friendly one; the typical state's central estimate falls between $535K and $775K. Where a specific medical malpractice wrongful death case sits inside — or beyond — its state's range depends on severity, economic damages, causation strength, and the state's damages cap. These are estimated ranges from MedLegal AI’s case-comparables model — directional planning estimates, not averages from a verdict database. Actual outcomes vary widely with the facts, venue, damages caps, and counsel.
Who can bring a medical malpractice wrongful death claim?
In most states a personal representative brings the claim for the benefit of a statutory class of survivors — typically the spouse, children, and sometimes parents or dependents. A separate survival action, where recognized, belongs to the estate and recovers the decedent's own damages before death. These are estimated ranges from MedLegal AI’s case-comparables model — directional planning estimates, not averages from a verdict database. Actual outcomes vary widely with the facts, venue, damages caps, and counsel.
Why do wrongful death values differ so much between states?
Because the claim is defined by statute: which survivors may recover, whether they may recover for loss of companionship or only pecuniary loss, whether conscious pain and suffering survives, and whether a separate wrongful-death or total-damages cap applies. Identical facts can be worth very different amounts across a state line. These are estimated ranges from MedLegal AI’s case-comparables model — directional planning estimates, not averages from a verdict database. Actual outcomes vary widely with the facts, venue, damages caps, and counsel.
What is the difference between a wrongful death claim and a survival claim?
The wrongful death claim compensates the survivors for their own losses from the death; the survival claim belongs to the estate and recovers the damages the decedent personally suffered between the negligent act and death, such as medical expenses and, in many states, conscious pain and suffering. These are estimated ranges from MedLegal AI’s case-comparables model — directional planning estimates, not averages from a verdict database. Actual outcomes vary widely with the facts, venue, damages caps, and counsel.
Get a case-specific read — not an injury-category range
Upload the medical records and Case Analysis maps the standard-of-care issues, causation chain, and comparables framing for the actual facts. Three free cases, no credit card.
Run a Case Analysis → Free Case ScoreRelated resources
- All injury types — settlement ranges
- All states — settlement & verdict ranges
- Free Settlement Valuation Calculator
- Free Damages-Cap Calculator
- Free Statute-of-Limitations Calculator
- Case Plan
This page is informational only and is not legal or medical advice. Figures are model estimates — consult a licensed attorney in the relevant state to evaluate any actual claim.