A life care plan is hundreds of line items, and opposing counsel only needs a handful to fail the foundation test: items no physician recommended, prices from a single phone call, categories that quietly duplicate each other. This AI examiner runs the item-by-item cross out loud and scores you on the post-2023 FRE 702 rubric — before the real deposition finds the soft rows in your table.
Start a free life care planning mock deposition → How the expert trainer worksThe life care planner's structural vulnerability is foundation: you are usually a nurse or rehabilitation professional, and the plan prescribes decades of medical care. Every item without a physician recommendation behind it is an invitation to ask who, exactly, ordered it.
The examiner in this trainer runs the classic sequence — foundation per item, pricing provenance, duplication, growth rates, life expectancy — and it will find the rows where the honest answer is "my clinical judgment."
Plan items — attendant care hours, future surgeries, equipment — with no treating or consulting physician recommendation behind them.
Items costed at billed charges or single facility quotes rather than usual-and-customary or negotiated rates.
Normal life expectancy adopted — or opined on — without medical support, in a plaintiff whose condition affects it.
Attendant care, facility care, and home modifications priced independently — overlapping the same hours and services.
A flat medical-inflation assumption applied plan-wide with no tie to CPI-medical data or a damages economist.
Single-vendor quotes with no survey and no documentation trail — a methodology no one else could replicate.
The examiner walks the plan item by item, asking one question each time — and counts how often the answer is your judgment instead of a physician's order.
Why this lands: Three "my clinical judgment" answers in a row and the plan reads as a nurse prescribing decades of medicine. The prepared planner knows exactly which items carry physician foundation and how to frame the ones that legitimately rest on planner methodology. The trainer makes you sort your own plan before opposing counsel does.
You enter your discipline and the plan type, and a realistic AI examiner cross-examines you out loud — item foundation, pricing sources, duplication, growth rates, life expectancy — the way defense counsel actually deposes planners. Every session ends with a 5-axis FRE 702/Daubert scorecard. Unlimited private reps.
Items without physician foundation, pricing from billed charges or single quotes, duplicated services across categories, unsupported growth rates, and life-expectancy assumptions outside the planner's expertise. Under post-2023 FRE 702, the "reliable application" prong is where item-by-item foundation attacks land.
Following the published life care planning standards of practice helps — if your file shows you actually followed them on this plan. The trainer's examiner tests the distance between the methodology you claim and the documentation trail behind each item.
Your first full AI mock deposition is free — no credit card. After that: a $99 one-time 30-day pass with unlimited sessions before a specific deposition, or Expert Pro at $39/mo if you are deposed regularly.
Yes. Sessions are private by default and are not shared with retaining counsel, opposing counsel, or anyone else. This is educational deposition practice, not legal advice — always follow the guidance of retaining counsel, and don't enter confidential case identifiers.
Your first full AI mock deposition is free — no credit card. Enter your field, get cross-examined out loud, and read your Daubert scorecard in about ten minutes.
Start your free mock deposition → Compare training options