See how AI medical-record review links every fact to the exact Bates page that proves it — click any citation and jump straight to the record.
See the 60-second demo →The weekly briefing for plaintiff medical malpractice attorneys. Five verdicts above $1M, new defense expert disclosures, one case-law update, one workflow tip — every Tuesday morning. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click. We never share your email.
Subscribed. Welcome — first issue arrives next Tuesday.
Compiled from CourtListener, state-court aggregators, and the MedLegal AI verdict aggregator. Each entry: jurisdiction, case caption, plaintiff counsel, defense counsel, theory of liability, key experts, verdict amount, and (when public) post-trial motions.
Federal Rule 26 expert disclosures filed publicly in plaintiff med-mal cases nationwide. Searchable by defense expert name — useful for cross-checking experts being deployed against you.
A recent appellate decision or Supreme Court case affecting plaintiff med-mal practice — Daubert, FRE 702, expert disclosure scope, damages caps, statute of limitations rulings.
From the founder's perspective at MedLegal AI: one practical technique for case workup, deposition prep, or evidence development that's been working in plaintiff practice.
Not affiliated with any law firm. Reports honestly on plaintiff practice, including hard truths about cases attorneys lost and why.
No paywall. Eventually one ad slot per issue from select non-competing vendors (court reporters, focus groups, lit finance). Editorial independent of advertising.
Targeted at 4-minute read. Built for the plaintiff partner reading email between depositions, not for SEO bloat.
CAN-SPAM compliant. STOP works. We use only AAJ public-directory and CourtListener public-docket sources.