Medical Malpractice Damages Worksheet (Economic + Non-Economic + Caps)

By John Mahoney | April 2026 | 9 min read

Verify it yourself — free, no login

See how AI medical-record review links every fact to the exact Bates page that proves it — click any citation and jump straight to the record.

See the 60-second demo →

Damages calculations make or break medical-malpractice case economics. Underestimate, and you take a case that loses money. Overestimate, and you reject cases that would have produced fee revenue. This worksheet is the framework experienced plaintiff attorneys use to build defensible damages numbers — at intake, in expert reports, and at trial.

The 4-category framework

Damages divide cleanly into four categories, three of which are economic (calculable from records) and one of which is non-economic (jury-determined within state-cap limits).

CategoryIncludesCalculation method
Past economicPast medical expenses, past lost earnings, past out-of-pocketRecords-based; sum of bills + W-2/tax-return analysis
Future economicFuture medical expenses, future lost earnings, future loss of household servicesLife care plan + economist; reduced to present value
Past non-economicPast pain & suffering, mental anguish, loss of consortiumJury determination; subject to state caps
Future non-economicFuture pain & suffering, future loss of consortiumJury determination; subject to state caps

Category 1: Past economic damages

Past economic damages are the easiest to prove and the hardest to inflate. Build them from primary records.

Past medical expenses

Sum every medical bill from the date of negligence through the date of trial (or settlement). Include:

Important: bill amount vs. paid amount. Most jurisdictions allow recovery of either "billed" amounts or "paid" amounts depending on case law. The collateral source rule has been narrowed in many states; check yours. The split between billed and paid is often 30-50% for hospital bills, so this question can change damages by hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Past lost earnings

Calculate from W-2s and tax returns spanning 3-5 years before the negligence date plus all years through trial. Include:

For self-employed plaintiffs, use accountant-prepared income statements and Schedule C/Schedule K-1 detail. For variable income (commission, freelance), use a 3-5 year average. Subtract any disability or unemployment benefits the plaintiff received during the loss period (these are usually deductible from damages even where the collateral source rule applies).

Past loss of household services

Often overlooked. The plaintiff's pre-injury contribution to household services (cooking, cleaning, child care, yard work, home maintenance) has economic value. The DOL Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes the going rate for each service category by region.

Calculate: hours per week × weeks since injury × hourly rate by service category. For a stay-at-home parent with three children, this can easily reach $30,000-$60,000/year.

Category 2: Future economic damages

Future economic damages require a life care planner and an economist. These are the highest-cost case-development line items but also where damages numbers concentrate.

Future medical expenses

The life care planner builds a multi-decade projection of all future medical needs:

For each line item, the planner specifies frequency, unit cost, and duration. Costs are projected forward using medical-inflation indices (typically 3-5%).

Future lost earnings

An economist calculates the present value of all future earnings the plaintiff would have earned but for the injury. Inputs:

The discount rate is heavily contested in court. Plaintiff economists typically use net discount rates of 1-2% (real wage growth net of risk-free rate). Defense economists use 3-5%. This single variable can change damages by 30-50%.

Category 3-4: Non-economic damages and state caps

Non-economic damages — pain and suffering, mental anguish, loss of consortium — are jury-determined within the bounds set by state cap statutes. Cap structure varies dramatically.

StateMed mal non-economic capNotes
California$390K (2024) → $750K (2034)MICRA expansion phase-in
Texas$250K per defendant; $500K totalOne of the strictest caps
FloridaNo cap (Estate of McCall, 2014)Cap struck as unconstitutional
Maryland$905K (rises annually)Combined economic + non-economic for some claims
Massachusetts$500K (with exceptions)Lifted for substantial / permanent disfigurement
New YorkNo cap on non-economicPlaintiff-friendly; most generous in nation
PennsylvaniaNo capCap struck as unconstitutional
IllinoisNo cap (Lebron, 2010)Cap struck as unconstitutional
Wisconsin$750KIndexed for inflation
Indiana$1.8M totalCaps total damages, not just non-economic

Verify your state's current cap before settling — caps are amended frequently and judicially struck without warning. For a current state-by-state damages reference, see our damages calculator.

Loss of consortium

Available in most jurisdictions for the plaintiff's spouse (and in some, for parents/children of an injured plaintiff). Treated as the spouse's separate claim in most states; in others, included in the plaintiff's overall non-economic recovery.

Practice tip: many cap statutes apply per claim or per claimant, not per case. In jurisdictions where consortium is a separate claim, two cap allowances may stack.

Wrongful death damages

Wrongful death claims have their own statutory damages structures, varying widely by state:

Many states have "non-economic" caps on wrongful death claims that interact with general med-mal caps in non-obvious ways. Get this analysis right at intake — the answer determines case viability.

Present value reduction

Future economic damages must be reduced to present value at trial. The plaintiff economist does this by discounting the future cash flows back to the trial date using a net discount rate.

Net discount rate = anticipated investment return − anticipated growth rate of the cost being projected. For medical inflation projected at 4% with investment return at 3.5%, net discount rate is −0.5% (effectively no discount, slight premium). For wages projected at 3% with investment return at 5%, net discount rate is +2%.

Plaintiff economists routinely use net discount rates of 1-2%. Defense economists routinely use 3-5%. The court will not adopt a "split the difference" approach automatically — argue your net discount rate from underlying economic literature, and be prepared to defend each component (anticipated wage growth, anticipated medical inflation, risk-free rate, equity premium).

The damages worksheet template

Use this 9-line template at intake and refine through case development:

  1. Past medical expenses: $______
  2. Past lost earnings: $______
  3. Past loss of household services: $______
  4. Future medical (life care plan, present value): $______
  5. Future lost earnings (economist, present value): $______
  6. Future loss of household services (present value): $______
  7. Past non-economic damages: $______
  8. Future non-economic damages: $______
  9. Total before cap: $______
  10. State cap reduction: $______
  11. Total post-cap: $______

Track this worksheet across every major case event (intake, after expert reports, post-deposition, mediation, pre-trial). The numbers move based on new evidence; document the moves.

Calculate damages in 30 seconds with state-cap rules baked in

Our free Damages Calculator handles economic + non-economic across all 50 states with cap rules and present-value reduction built in. No signup. Plus our paid platform automates life care plan integration + economist worksheets.

Use Damages Calculator →

John Mahoney is the founder of MedLegal AI. He builds AI tools for medical-malpractice plaintiff attorneys. Questions? [email protected]

See the AI cite its source — no login
Most legal AI is wrong 17–33% of the time. Watch MedLegal AI pin every finding to the exact record page — click any citation and it jumps to the line that proves it.
Watch the 30-second demo →