See how AI medical-record review links every fact to the exact Bates page that proves it — click any citation and jump straight to the record.
See the 60-second demo →We talk a lot about what our free tools do. This is a teardown that shows them doing it. Below is a synthetic, de-identified med-mal fact pattern run through three of our free tools — the medical chronology, the case-merit score, and Bates-cited record search. Every timeline entry, every number, and every citation below is the genuine output of an actual tool run. Nothing was hand-edited.
▶ Watch the tools in action (2-min demo)
A patient presents to the ED with pleuritic chest pain, shortness of breath, heart rate 112, and an oxygen saturation of 93%. They are diagnosed with musculoskeletal chest pain, given ibuprofen, and discharged. Four days later they return by ambulance with syncope and severe dyspnea; a CT pulmonary angiogram shows a saddle pulmonary embolism with right heart strain.
If you do plaintiff med-mal intake, you already feel the two questions: is this case real, and is it worth funding? Here is how the tools answer them in about the time it takes to read this paragraph.
Drop the records in and the Medical Chronology tool returns a clean, dated timeline — and it surfaces something a fast human read can miss:
Look at the diagnosis line — it was 2025-09-02 16:40 — Musculoskeletal chest pain (active) — ⚠ entered/changed 20d later (2025-09-22). An entry edited weeks after the encounter, after the true diagnosis became undeniable, is exactly the late-entry/amendment pattern that drives a records audit-trail request. The tool flags it automatically.
Feed the same facts to the Case Merit & Defensibility Score and it returns a defensibility read — grounded in the published payment-by-merit literature, not a guess:
Why it lands there — the tool's own drivers:
Studdert NEJM 2006 payment-by-merit gradient + Peters 2008 merit/payout synthesis; decision support, not a dollar valuation.
When you build the demand, prep the deposition, or write the report, you need the page, not just the fact. The Bates-Cited Record Search stamps each record and ties every answer to its source:
Ask it "where is the elevated D-dimer documented?" and it returns the answer with the exact Bates page — no hunting through a 2,000-page production.
Three tools, one synthetic case, under a minute — a screened case with a defensibility number, a timeline with the alteration flagged, and every fact cited to its page. No signup, no card, nothing retained past 30 days, and nothing you upload is used to train AI models.
Run your next intake through them free free: https://medicalai.law/free-tools
This teardown uses a synthetic, de-identified fact pattern; all tool output is genuine but the case is fictional. The tools are decision support for attorneys and experts, not legal advice or a dollar valuation.
Six-pattern audit on a sample case in 90 seconds. No credit card.
Try the free Daubert workup →